Case 6000653/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Ennis v Ms L Murphy — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000653/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Ennis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a complaint of unfair dismissal brought by Mrs J Ennis against Ms L Murphy. By a letter dated 31 July 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out, because the claimant had been employed for less than two years by the respondent.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment does not record any substantive determination on the merits of dismissal itself.
The reasons note that the claim for outstanding notice pay remained outstanding. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 31 July 2024 to make representations or request a hearing on the basis that she had been employed for less than two years. The claimant did not make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.