Case 6000691/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ramamurthy Ganesh v Youngharry DG International Company Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000691/2023
- Decision date
- 17 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ramamurthy Ganesh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 19 March 2024 before Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone at Leicester Hearing Centre by video link. The claimant did not attend and had not told the Tribunal that he would not be attending. The Tribunal recorded that it made reasonable efforts to contact him before the hearing but was unable to do so.
The judgment states that the claimant had failed to file any evidence in support of his claim, in breach of the Tribunal’s orders set out in the Notice of Claim sent on 17 July 2023. In those circumstances, the Tribunal decided to proceed with the hearing in the claimant’s absence.
The only claim identified in the written judgment was a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. That claim was dismissed. The written record does not set out any award of compensation or other remedy, and no monetary figures are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant did not attend the hearing, had not informed the Tribunal he would not be attending, and had filed no evidence in support of the claim. The Tribunal proceeded in his absence and dismissed the claims for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.