Case 6000718/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A. Thawes First v Manpower UK Ltd Second Respondent: NNB Generation Company (HPC) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000718/2023
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Members
- Venue
- Bristol ET
- Panel members
- D. England, L. Fellows
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A. Thawes First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 July 2024 before Employment Judge G. King, with lay members D. England and L. Fellows. The written record states that the Claimant's claim against the First Respondent, Manpower UK Ltd, was not well founded and was dismissed.
The same judgment record states that the Claimant's claim against the Second Respondent, NNB Generation Company (HPC) Ltd, was also not well founded and was dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded.
The extracted text does not include the tribunal's substantive reasons, and it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment text states only that the Claimant's claim against the First Respondent and the Claimant's claim against the Second Respondent were each 'not well founded' and dismissed. The published case listing identifies the matter as Race Discrimination; the extracted text does not set out the pleaded allegations in full. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.