Case 6000748/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Paine v Ju-Lee pub Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000748/2024
- Decision date
- 16 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Paine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Exeter Employment Tribunals on 28 February 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Midgley determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Ju-Lee pub ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Miss Paine’s wages and ordered payment of £372 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £503.45.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £265.20. The total sum payable was £1,140.65.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as gross pay. | Upheld | — | £372 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £503 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £265 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,141
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.