Case 6000769/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Michniak v Forza Foods Limited AT A PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000769/2023
- Decision date
- 1 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Michniak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing in Leeds on 1 September 2023 before Employment Judge Lancaster, the tribunal considered Miss S Michniak's claim against Forza Foods Limited. The only claim recorded in the judgment was indirect race discrimination.
The tribunal decided that the indirect race discrimination claim had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless either party requested them within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination claim struck out at a public preliminary hearing as having no reasonable prospect of success. The written record says reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.