Case 6000777/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages and holiday-pay claims against Passive Tax Ltd
The claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 1 March 2024. Passive Tax LTD did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Adkinson made a rule 21 determination on the papers.
- Case reference
- 6000777/2024
- Decision date
- 25 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Baranovska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 1 March 2024. Passive Tax LTD did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Adkinson made a rule 21 determination on the papers.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £10,064.60 gross plus an additional £173.37 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £387.38.
The judgment does not set out any separate heads of award beyond the monetary figures recorded for those two findings. The total sum payable on the face of the judgment is £10,625.35 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records an award of £10,064.60 gross and an additional £173.37 gross on the unlawful deductions finding; it does not give a separate breakdown for the additional amount. | Upheld | — | £10,238 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £387 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,625
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.