Case 6000785/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Brown v Taylor Made Burgers Barnsley Ltd HELD at Leeds by CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000785/2024
- Decision date
- 7 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for notice pay, redundancy pay, holiday pay and wages against Taylor Made Burgers Barnsley Ltd, which ceased trading on 26 November 2023. The respondent did not appear, was not represented and did not file a response. Employment Judge Shulman, sitting alone at Leeds by CVP, found that the claimant had two years' service from 6 October 2021 to 3 December 2023, was 28 years old at termination and had a gross weekly wage of £500.00.
The Tribunal upheld the claims for notice pay (£1,000.00 gross, the claimant having worked her notice), redundancy pay (£1,000.00, applying a multiplier of one for age and two years' service) and one day's holiday pay (£100.00 on 66.6 hours accrued against a 40-hour week), producing a grand total of £2,100.00. The wages claim was dismissed because it was in effect a double claim equivalent to the notice pay already awarded.
The Tribunal further dismissed the claimant's applications for 'other compensation' and for interest, explaining to the claimant that it could not award either on the compensation ordered.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay of £1,000.00 gross awarded; claimant worked her notice. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Redundancy | Two years' service from 6 October 2021 to 3 December 2023; age 28 (multiplier of one); gross weekly pay £500.00. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Holiday pay | One day's holiday pay (66.6 hours accrued on a 40-hour week). | Upheld | — | £100 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Wages claim dismissed as equivalent to and a double claim with the notice pay already awarded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claimant's application for 'other compensation' dismissed; Tribunal explained it could not award this. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Application for interest on the compensation ordered was dismissed; Tribunal explained it could not award interest. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,100
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.