Case 6000802/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Coopers Pub Company Ltd T/a The Packhouse — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000802/2023
- Decision date
- 9 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Broughton Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs M Kovacs brought three money claims: unpaid wages, unpaid holiday pay, and notice pay. The unpaid wages claim was pleaded as a breach of contract claim under Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, and the holiday pay claim was brought under regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The tribunal held that the unpaid wages claim was not well founded and dismissed it. It also held that the unpaid holiday pay claim was not well founded and dismissed it.
The notice pay claim succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £421.42 gross for the period 4 January 2023 to 11 January 2023. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid wages brought under Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994; found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay under regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay succeeded; the tribunal ordered payment of £421.42 gross for the period 4 January 2023 to 11 January 2023. | Upheld | — | £421 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £421
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Article 3 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.