Case 6000810/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Revill-Collins v Rivus Group — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000810/2023
- Decision date
- 9 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Revill-Collins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs L Revill-Collins's unfair dismissal complaint. It held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim, and found that she had been employed by Rivus Group for less than two years.
The tribunal also recorded that the Claimant had been given the opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but had failed to give an acceptable reason. The judgment states that the other complaints were not affected by this decision, and that it did not prevent the Claimant from pursuing any discrimination allegation about her dismissal within a discrimination claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Claimant had less than two years' service, so section 108 ERA 1996 barred the unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal also found she had not given an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.