Case 6000818/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Lees v Specsavers Optical Superstores Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000818/2023
- Decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Lees
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant was given an opportunity, by letter dated 29 January 2024, to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 15 August 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Cadney Date struck out the claim. The judgment was sent to the parties on 23 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not itemise individual pleaded claims. It records that the claimant did not make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the tribunal's strike-out warning. The text refers to an order dated 15 August 2024, which appears inconsistent with the judgment date; retained as written. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.