Chloe Clevett v Easyjet — 2026

Case reference: 6000849/2026
Decision date: 4 June 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Warren Date

Indexed: 22 July 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Chloe Clevett

Respondent

Easyjet

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Chloe Clevett complained of unfair dismissal against Easyjet. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint and found that Clevett had been employed by Easyjet for less than two years.

The tribunal found that Clevett had not given an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. It therefore struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded or addressed.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The claim was struck out because the claimant had less than the two years' service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and did not give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.