Case 6000860/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Lauren Arafat v Strike Limited HELD AT: Leeds By CVP — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000860/2023
- Decision date
- 2 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Lauren Arafat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing on 26 September and 2 November 2023, Employment Judge JM Wade considered whether two complaints should be struck out: a protective award complaint and a complaint for unlawful deductions from wages said to cover full pay from May to December 2022. The claimant, Ms Lauren Arafat, appeared in person and the respondent, Strike Limited, was represented by counsel.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint struck out at a public preliminary hearing. The tribunal recorded that employee representatives had been consulted, so the claim was factually misconceived. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint for full pay from May to December 2022 struck out. The tribunal found the claimant's own case could not sustain the assertion that she had remained suspended and entitled to full pay during that period. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.