Case 6000906/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Page v Leicestershire County Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000906/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Page
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Page brought claims of maternity and pregnancy discrimination and sex discrimination against Leicestershire County Council. Employment Judge Adkinson, sitting alone at Leicester on 21 May 2024, heard from the claimant in person and from the respondent’s solicitor.
The Tribunal held that both sets of discrimination claims were presented out of time. It found that it was not just and equitable to extend time for either claim, and therefore dismissed both because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear them.
No liability findings were made on the substance of the allegations. All future hearings were vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Presented out of time; the Tribunal held it was not just and equitable to extend time and dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | Presented out of time; the Tribunal held it was not just and equitable to extend time and dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.