Case 6000909/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Daniel Greaves v TVS Supply Chain Solutions Ltd RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000909/2023
- Decision date
- 7 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Drake Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Daniel Greaves
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 6 March 2025 before Employment Judge R S Drake, the Claimant, Mr Daniel Greaves, confirmed on advice that he could not pursue the claims under the heads of breach of contract and detriment because of having made qualifying protected disclosures. The Respondent, TVS Supply Chain Solutions Ltd, consented to the withdrawal of those claims.
The judgment records those two claims as dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the Claimant. No merits findings were made on those claims and no remedy was awarded in respect of them.
The Claimant also confirmed that he would proceed only with his remaining complaints listed as direct disability discrimination and being treated unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of his alleged disability. Those claims were described as remaining extant and were not determined in this record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | At the preliminary hearing the Claimant confirmed he could not pursue this claim; the judgment records it as dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The detriment claim based on qualifying protected disclosures was withdrawn and the judgment records it as dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.