Case 6000983/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hawthorne v St Peters Catholic High School and Sixth Form Centre — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000983/2023
- Decision date
- 20 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hawthorne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol on 10 April 2024, Employment Judge Livesey considered a preliminary issue in Mr G Hawthorne’s claim against St Peters Catholic High School and Sixth Form Centre. The tribunal recorded that the claim had been brought out of time, but held that it was just and equitable to extend time under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 so that the claim could continue.
The extracted judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying discrimination complaint. It records only that the claim proceeds in accordance with the case management order of the same date, and that the judgment was sent to the parties on 20 May 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Preliminary ruling only. The tribunal found the claim had been brought out of time, but it was just and equitable to extend time under s.123 Equality Act 2010 so that the claim could continue. No merits decision appears in the extracted text. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.