Case 6000999/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ann-Marie Joy v Annie’s Orphans (under charity number of Bangor Pentecostal Church) — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000999/2023
- Decision date
- 19 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. M.
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ann-Marie Joy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAnn-Marie Joy brought claims against Annie’s Orphans (under charity number of Bangor Pentecostal Church) for wrongful dismissal, dismissal and detriments because of making protected disclosures, accrued untaken holiday pay, unlawful deduction from wages, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The case was heard at Southampton Employment Tribunal via CVP on 12 April 2024 before Employment Judge Salter. The judgment did not determine the merits of any of the claims.
The tribunal held that the wrongful dismissal, protected disclosure dismissal, protected disclosure detriment, holiday pay, and unlawful deduction from wages claims were presented out of time in circumstances where it was reasonably practicable to have presented them in time. It also held that the reasonable adjustment claim was presented out of time and was not presented within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable.
Accordingly, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time and therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim that dismissal was because of making a protected disclosure was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time and therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim for detriments on grounds of making a protected disclosure was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time and therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for payment for accrued but untaken holiday was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time and therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction from wages was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time and therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustment claim was presented out of time and was not presented within such period as the tribunal considered just and equitable; the tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable to have been presented in time
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.