Case 6001080/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. B Tassell v Oakham Town Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001080/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. B Tassell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because of non-compliance with tribunal orders and because the claim was not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations and did not request a hearing.
As a result, Employment Judge Heap struck out the claim on 16 November 2024. The hearing listed for 13, 14 and 15 January 2025 will not take place. No substantive determination of the pleaded claims or any remedy was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not list the underlying causes of action, but the gov.uk case listing for this case identifies breach of contract among the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not list the underlying causes of action, but the gov.uk case listing for this case identifies public interest disclosure/whistleblowing among the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not list the underlying causes of action, but the gov.uk case listing for this case identifies unfair dismissal among the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.