Case 6001105/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Munro v KTech Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001105/2025
- Decision date
- 16 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Munro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Leith following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure on the claim, or part of it, which had been presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 12 January 2025.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,200 gross. It further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £730 gross. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £365 gross.
The hearing previously listed for 5 and 6 March 2026 was cancelled. The judgment was approved on 12 June 2025 and sent to the parties on 16 June 2025.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent failed to present a valid response. Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of gross £1,200. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Breach of contract | Claimant dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of gross £730 awarded. | Upheld | — | £730 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered to pay gross £365. Treated under holiday_pay (Working Time Regulations holiday entitlement). | Upheld | — | £365 |
| Unfair dismissal | Listed on the gov.uk categories as an unfair dismissal claim, but the Rule 21 judgment text does not expressly adjudicate or quantify an unfair dismissal claim. Status unclear from this judgment; treated as 'other' with no remedy attributed. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,295
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.