Case 6001120/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Awe v Mondial Lighting Company Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 6001120/2023
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Awe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr O Awe’s unfair dismissal complaint because he failed to pay the £250 deposit ordered after a case management preliminary hearing on 14 September 2023. The order was sent to him on 5 October 2023, and the tribunal found that the deposit had not been paid.
On that basis, the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the case remained listed for a public preliminary hearing on 8 January 2024, but issue 2.1 of the case management orders dated 5 October 2023 was no longer applicable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £250 following a preliminary hearing on 14 September 2023, but did not pay it. The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.