Case 6001151/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J M Rodrigues Monteiro v Virpas Auto Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001151/2025
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J M Rodrigues Monteiro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 12 January 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Miller decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1225 gross and stated that the total payable was £1225.
The tribunal stated that it did not have power to make an award for compensation for distress or interest in a claim of unauthorised deductions from wages.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay £1225 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,225 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,225
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.