Case 6001165/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. C Taylor v Event Corp Leisure Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001165/2025
- Decision date
- 13 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. C Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented at the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 13 January 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £368.60, being the gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax and National Insurance. The complaint of breach of contract relating to notice pay was also found well-founded, with damages of £554.40 awarded on a gross basis to reflect the likelihood of Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment.
The respondent was ordered to pay a total of £923.00. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Rayner on 4 August 2025 and sent to the parties on 5 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross sum deducted; claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £369 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for notice pay, calculated on gross pay as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £554 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £923
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.