Case 6001231/2023 · Employment Tribunal
K Mcdonald-Davis v Abbey Green Therapeutic Children Services — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001231/2023
- Decision date
- 9 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K Mcdonald-Davis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that by letter dated 16 February 2024 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order of 12 October 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Broughton ordered that the claim be struck out. The reasons do not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim(s) or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause(s) of action beyond stating that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with an order dated 12 October 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.