Case 6001238/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Talbot-Sykes v Dr Alison Eden t/a Lepton Dental Practice and Shepley Dental Practice — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001238/2023
- Decision date
- 12 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Talbot-Sykes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It referred to paragraph 5 of the Case Management Orders dated 31 January 2024, sent to the parties on 12 February 2024, which had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Bright recorded that the claim was struck out. The hearing fixed for 15 May 2024 was therefore vacated. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.