Case 6001245/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Williamson v G & K Cothliff Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001245/2025
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Williamson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 22 judgment, Employment Judge Phil Allen found that G & K Cothliff Limited had failed to pay Mr J Williamson's holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £119.60 in respect of that issue.
The judgment does not set out any wider liability findings on the claimant's other complaints. It states that the remaining complaints were to proceed to a hearing on 27 May 2025. An accompanying notice explains the tribunal's standard interest position and records the relevant decision day as 19 March 2025, with the calculation day as 20 March 2025 and the stipulated rate at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £119.60. The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining complaints were to proceed to a later hearing on 27 May 2025. | Upheld | — | £120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £120
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.