Case 6001262/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Davis v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001262/2023
- Decision date
- 8 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 March 2025, under paragraph 9 of the Case Management Order, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 30 July 2025 did not take place, and the judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying allegations.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was struck out for non-pursuit; the extracted text does not separate outcomes by claim, but the case listing identified disability discrimination as one of the pleaded categories. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim was struck out for non-pursuit; the extracted text does not separate outcomes by claim, but the case listing identified unfair dismissal as one of the pleaded categories. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.