Case 6001299/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Priscott v Logitech Recruitment Limited DEFAULT — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001299/2024
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Priscott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a default judgment in the Claimant’s favour against Logitech Recruitment Limited. The tribunal declared that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages and ordered payment of £3,541.67 gross. It also found that the Respondent had failed to pay accrued holiday pay and ordered payment of £2,541.93 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Respondent made unlawful deductions from the Claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,541.67. All sums were stated to be gross figures. | Upheld | — | £3,542 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the Respondent failed to pay accrued holiday pay and ordered payment of £2,541.93. All sums were stated to be gross figures. | Upheld | — | £2,542 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment found that the Claimant was wrongfully dismissed and ordered notice pay of £5,721.17. All sums were stated to be gross figures. | Upheld | — | £5,721 |
| Redundancy | The judgment declared that the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,501. All sums were stated to be gross figures. | Upheld | — | £4,501 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,306
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.