Case 6001342/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Miss Nowell, barrister — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001342/2023
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 15 April 2024, before Employment Judge Cox, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent represented by Miss Nowell, barrister, the tribunal recorded a short judgment disposing of the case by withdrawal. The judgment states that the listed matters were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.
The claims recorded as withdrawn were the claim against the Fourth Respondent, the unauthorised deduction of wages claim for 17 July 2022, the statutory sick pay claim, the indirect discrimination claim, the victimisation claim, and the claim for damages for breach of contract. The judgment contains no findings on the merits of those claims and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim against the Fourth Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant; no further legal label is given in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deduction of wages claim for 17 July 2022 was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records dismissal on withdrawal of the statutory sick pay claim; the extracted text does not specify any further statutory detail. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records dismissal on withdrawal of the indirect discrimination claim; the extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic, so no discrimination sub-type has been inferred. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The damages for breach of contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.