Case 6001354/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A. Douglas v Teleperformance limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001354/2024
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A. Douglas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's discrimination claims for lack of jurisdiction. It found that the claims had been presented outside the time limit in section 123 Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal further decided that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit under section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010, so the claims could not proceed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment records no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claims of discrimination were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because they were presented outside the section 123 Equality Act 2010 time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. The gov.uk listing category identifies disability discrimination, but the judgment text itself refers only to 'claims of discrimination' without further detail. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.