Case 6001363/2025 · Employment Tribunal
L Jones v Harriot Bars Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001363/2025
- Decision date
- 14 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 14 January 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Cadney determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination could properly be made on the claim without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,587. The judgment records that figure as the total sum payable.
The judgment was approved on 5 November 2025 and sent to the parties on 11 November 2025. No legal tests, panel members, or further reasoning are set out in the one-page judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 determination following the respondent's failure to present a valid response in time. The judgment frames the unpaid sum as the claimant's holiday entitlement; the gov.uk listing categorised the matter under Working Time Regulations, but the operative finding is non-payment of holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,587 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,587
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.