Case 6001379/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Williams v Arnold Clark Automobiles Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 6001379/2023
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard as a private preliminary hearing at East Midlands by video on 31 October 2023 before Employment Judge Shore. The claimant, Miss V Williams, appeared in person and the respondent, Arnold Clark Automobiles Limited, was represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that, by consent, the claimant’s claims of sex discrimination and unauthorised deduction from wages were dismissed in their entirety. The written record does not set out substantive findings on liability beyond that agreed disposal.
The tribunal noted that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No financial remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed in its entirety by consent at the private preliminary hearing on 31 October 2023. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed in its entirety by consent at the private preliminary hearing on 31 October 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.