Case 6001381/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mohamed v Barts NHS Hospital Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001381/2025
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mohamed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal removed NHS East and South East London Pathology Partnership as a respondent under rule 35 of the ET Rules of Procedure 2024 because it was not a legal entity. The judgment records that the claimant and the remaining respondent agreed to that course.
The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeded. It also held that the wrongful dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeded. No written reasons were included because reasons had been given orally, and a separate hearing was to be listed to decide remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal is well-founded and succeeds. Remedy was reserved for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim of wrongful dismissal, which is represented here as breach_of_contract under the locked taxonomy. Remedy was reserved for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.