Case 6001390/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gerry Rowley v Siemens plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001390/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gerry Rowley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing on 30 May 2025 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke, the tribunal considered Mr Gerry Rowley’s claims against Siemens plc for unfair dismissal and race discrimination. The respondent was represented by solicitor Mr P Nainthy; the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal dismissed both claims for want of jurisdiction because they were out of time. No merits findings are recorded in the written judgment beyond the jurisdictional dismissal. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 13 June 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at a public preliminary hearing for want of jurisdiction, on the basis that it was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed at a public preliminary hearing for want of jurisdiction, on the basis that it was out of time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.