Case 6001433/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr O Ogunyanwo (consultant Alpha Shindara legal) For the v Mr N Wilson (solicitor) — 2025

Case reference: 6001433/2023
Decision date: 30 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Davies Appearances
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr O Ogunyanwo (consultant Alpha Shindara legal) For the

Respondent

Mr N Wilson (solicitor)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard at Leeds by CVP on 20 June 2025 before Employment Judge Davies. The written judgment records that the claimant failed to comply with Tribunal orders and that a fair hearing was no longer possible.

On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The written record does not set out detailed findings on the underlying age, disability, race discrimination, or unfair dismissal allegations, and it records no monetary award.

The note to the judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days. The record published online therefore contains only the strike-out decision and not a substantive reasons judgment.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	The judgment states that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders. It does not separately distinguish the outcome for this pleaded claim.	Struck out	Age	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders. It does not separately distinguish the outcome for this pleaded claim.	Struck out	Disability	—
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders. It does not separately distinguish the outcome for this pleaded claim.	Struck out	Race	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders. It does not separately distinguish the outcome for this pleaded claim.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.