Ms S Sennett v Vape Suite Ltd — 2024

Case reference: 6001497/2024
Decision date: 1 October 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms S Sennett

Respondent

Vape Suite Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard at Leeds by CVP video link on 30 September 2024 before Employment Judge Shepherd. In a consent judgment, the tribunal recorded that the parties had agreed orally at the hearing that the respondent would pay the claimant £495.00 gross notice pay.

The written judgment also records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No separate findings of liability are set out beyond the consent order for notice pay and the withdrawal of the unfair dismissal claim.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	Consent judgment recorded that, following an oral agreement at the hearing, the respondent would pay the claimant £495.00 gross notice pay.	Settled	—	£495
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £495; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.