Case 6001541/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Ramcharan v Altum Capital Partners Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001541/2025
- Decision date
- 26 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Ramcharan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the South East Employment Tribunal on 15 January 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Hawksworth decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. On that basis, the tribunal determined the matter without a valid response from the respondent.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £37,650.17 gross. The judgment states that this amount represented unpaid wages for the period May 2024 to October 2024, including the period of notice worked by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £37,650.17 gross. The judgment does not apportion the sum between separate heads of claim. | Upheld | — | £37,650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £37,650
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.