Case 6001568/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Walker v Polygon Public House Limited (company number 11092248) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001568/2025
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, employed as an Assistant General Manager from 7 October 2024 to 24 November 2024, brought a claim under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unauthorised deductions from wages after resigning without notice. The respondent had withheld both basic pay for 31 hours worked and a tronc-distributed service charge element, relying on a Service Charge Policy that permitted forfeiture where the claimant did not adhere to the notice period, and on advice from its payroll provider that it could withhold pay to cover the cost of arranging shift cover.
The Tribunal found the claimant's hourly rate was £17.00 (comprising £11.44 basic pay and £5.56 said to be a discretionary service charge bonus). Applying sections 13 and 27 ERA 1996 together with the common law rule in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79 HL, the Tribunal held that the Service Charge Policy operated as an unenforceable penalty clause because there was no genuine pre-estimate of loss and the respondent produced no evidence of the loss it said it had suffered. The deduction of £527 gross (£17.00 x 31 hours) was therefore unlawful.
The further heads of claim were not successful: the Landlord Fees element was unevidenced, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction over damages for stress and impact on confidence, and the claimant did not advance or evidence his holiday pay claim. The respondent had ticked the employer's contract claim box on the ET3 but provided no particulars.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal declared £527 gross was unlawfully deducted, representing £17.00 per hour x 31 hours (combining the 'short pay' and 'missing service charge' elements). The Service Charge Policy purporting to allow forfeiture for failure to give notice was held to be an unenforceable penalty clause. | Upheld | — | £527 |
| Holiday pay | Claimant ticked holiday pay on the claim form but did not advance or evidence the holiday pay claim at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for 'Landlord Fees' (two late payment fees of £35) was not evidenced. Claim for damages for stress and confidence impact was outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £527
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79 HL
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.