Ms E Milnes v JCT 600 Ltd — 2024

Case reference: 6001579/2024
Decision date: 18 September 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Miller Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms E Milnes

Respondent

JCT 600 Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 8 April 2024. The respondent, JCT 600 Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.

The judgment states that the claim succeeds. The tribunal found that Ms E Milnes was unfairly dismissed. No further reasoning is set out in the extracted judgment beyond the Rule 21 determination and the finding of unfair dismissal.

Remedy was not decided in this judgment. The tribunal recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be decided at a separate Remedy Hearing.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.