Case 6001596/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hussain v Renaissance Personnel Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001596/2025
- Decision date
- 14 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moyler REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Moyler, sitting alone at London Central by CVP on 2 May 2025, heard the claim of Mr S Hussain against Renaissance Personnel Ltd. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The claimant was employed under a contract providing an annual salary for a guaranteed 39 hours' work per week, and should have been paid £30,759.30 in basic salary for the period 29 January 2024 to 2 May 2025, together with £997.65 in overtime, totalling £31,756.95. He had instead received £4,138.40 into his bank account.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £27,573.55, being the gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance not deducted at source. The complaint in respect of holiday pay was not well-founded because the claimant had not taken, or requested to take, any annual leave.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. Claimant was entitled to £31,756.95 (basic salary £30,759.30 plus overtime £997.65) but received only £4,138.40, leaving a gross sum deducted of £27,573.55 which the respondent was ordered to pay. | Upheld | — | £27,574 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay was not well-founded as the claimant had not taken, or requested to take, any annual leave. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £27,574
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.