Case 6001612/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Thomas v Top Tubes Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6001612/2025
- Decision date
- 20 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Akhtar
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 20 January 2026, Employment Judge Akhtar, sitting alone, found that Mr J Thomas's complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay and contractual benefits was well-founded. The tribunal therefore upheld the breach of contract complaint.
No damages were awarded. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had mitigated his loss and consequently suffered no financial loss. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The complaint was in relation to notice pay and contractual benefits. The tribunal found it well-founded but made no damages award because the claimant mitigated his loss and suffered no financial loss. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.