Case 6001628/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Davies v LRES UK Ltd Heard at Leeds by CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001628/2024
- Decision date
- 11 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies For
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr W Davies brought a complaint against LRES UK Ltd described as breach of contract/unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of notice pay. The hearing was at Leeds by CVP on 3 October 2024 before Employment Judge Davies, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Ushieagu.
The tribunal decided that the complaint had not been presented within the relevant time limit under article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994 or section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time.
On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaint and dismissed it. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The complaint was described as breach of contract/unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of notice pay. The tribunal held it was not presented in time under article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 or s 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.