Case 6001666/2023 · Employment Tribunal
F Ridley v Daron Motors Ltd T/A Daron Ford — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001666/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
F Ridley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a Case Management Order dated 04 July 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Roper ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment does not record any merits determination of the underlying claims. The hearing listed for 22 to 26 July 2024 was vacated as a result of the strike-out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying causes of action. It strikes out the claim as a whole because, after the Case Management Order dated 04 July 2024, the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.