Case 6001674/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Marcin Baran v Brake Bros Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001674/2024
- Decision date
- 23 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beever Appearances
- Venue
- at Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Marcin Baran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the Claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time of 18 October 2023 to 12 April 2024 by reason of a wrist and elbow impairment.
The tribunal dismissed the wrongful dismissal claim, the protected disclosure detriment claims, the unfair dismissal claim under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the direct race discrimination claim about sick pay and Polish nationality. Each dismissed claim was found to have no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the Claimant was a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time, but does not adjudicate a substantive disability discrimination claim in the extracted text. | Other | Disability | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal found the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure detriment claims under section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996 were dismissed because the tribunal found they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim contrary to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The direct discrimination claim concerning sick pay and Polish nationality was dismissed because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.