Case 6001684/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Asheka v The Pines Residential care / Sandbourne House Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001684/2023
- Decision date
- 28 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Asheka
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Asheka presented claims on 31 August 2023 for age discrimination, race discrimination and unlawful deduction from wages against The Pines Residential care / Sandbourne House Ltd. The respondent did not present a response. The hearing on 7 May 2024 was listed as a remedy hearing, but neither party attended.
By letter dated 1 May 2024, the claimant had been ordered to write to the tribunal before 8 May 2024 explaining how much she was claiming and how that figure had been calculated. The tribunal recorded that she sent an email stating her current pay, but did not set out how much she was claiming. The clerk also tried to telephone her using the number on the ET1, but it was no longer in use.
Employment Judge Volkmer issued a strike out warning dated 8 May 2024. The warning said the tribunal was considering striking out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the 1 May 2024 order and had not been actively pursuing the case. The order gave the claimant 7 days to object in writing or request a hearing. This extract does not record any final strike out, liability finding, or remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Claim presented on 31 August 2023. This extract does not contain a final merits determination; the tribunal issued a strike out warning because the claimant had not complied with the order of 1 May 2024 to say how much was being claimed and how it was calculated, and because the claimant had not been actively pursuing the case. | Other | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Claim presented on 31 August 2023. This extract does not contain a final merits determination; the tribunal issued a strike out warning because the claimant had not complied with the order of 1 May 2024 to say how much was being claimed and how it was calculated, and because the claimant had not been actively pursuing the case. | Other | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim presented on 31 August 2023. This extract does not contain a final merits determination; the tribunal issued a strike out warning because the claimant had not complied with the order of 1 May 2024 to say how much was being claimed and how it was calculated, and because the claimant had not been actively pursuing the case. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.