Case 6001705/2023 · Employment Tribunal
L Peters v Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001705/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Peters
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short strike-out decision. By case management order dated 3 July 2024, sent to the parties the same day, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with Employment Judge Gray's order to provide a schedule of loss by 26 March 2024 and had not responded to the respondent's solicitor's letter about the bundle for the 3 July hearing, dated 4 June 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded claim types. It states only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with an order to provide a schedule of loss by 26 March 2024, failed to respond to the respondent's solicitor's letter about the bundle for the 3 July hearing dated 4 June 2024, and did not make written representations or request a hearing after being given that opportunity by case management order dated 3 July 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.