Case 6001724/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Taylor v Joy Plumbing Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001724/2024
- Decision date
- 28 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Taylor brought a claim against Joy Plumbing Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation). The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr Taylor £2,477.86 gross.
The judgment records a single total award of £2,477.86 and does not split the sum into separate heads of loss or indicate any additional remedy beyond that wage deduction award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum due. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the matter was determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. | Upheld | — | £2,478 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,478
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.