Case 6001738/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Marie Dzirvinskis v Lifeways SIL Ltd. — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001738/2022
- Decision date
- 6 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. M.
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Marie Dzirvinskis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol Employment Tribunal via CVP on 16 May 2024 before Employment Judge M. Salter. The Claimant, Marie Dzirvinskis, appeared in person and the Respondent, Lifeways SIL Ltd., was represented by counsel. The written judgment records that the Claimant's claims of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of either claim in the written reasons. It states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim; the written judgment states it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability claim; the written judgment states it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.