Case 6001786/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Ellis v M4 Recruitment Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001786/2024
- Decision date
- 22 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Knowles Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Ellis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, a Regional Hub manager employed from 6 June 2022, was dismissed by letter dated 12 January 2024. The tribunal found that the Respondent had attempted to back-date the notice of termination to 10 January 2024, but the correctly calculated effective date of termination was 9 February 2024. The Claimant was paid only to 7 February 2024, resulting in an unauthorised deduction of 2 days' pay (£227.85), calculated using daily accrual under the Apportionment Act 1870.
On holiday pay, the tribunal held that although the Respondent's policy stated employees "should" take remaining holiday during their notice period, this did not deem leave to have been used. The Respondent had not put the Claimant on notice that he must take leave at a particular time, and the Claimant had not sought line manager agreement, so the 6 days accrued holiday remained outstanding at termination, giving rise to an unauthorised deduction of £969.24.
On the £403 deducted for company car damage, the tribunal found the contractual clause ambiguous as to whether liability extended beyond insurance excess for damage the Claimant was responsible for, and construed the ambiguity against the employer. With no evidence that the Claimant was responsible for the damage (the lease company's inspection report being dated three weeks after the vehicle was returned), the deduction was not authorised.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction of 2 days' pay; Respondent attempted to back-date notice to 10 January 2024, but tribunal found the effective date of termination was 9 February 2024. Award £227.85 (gross). | Upheld | — | £227 |
| Holiday pay | 6 days accrued but untaken holiday pay unlawfully deducted; calculated at £161.54 per working day. Award £969.24 (gross). | Upheld | — | £969 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction of £403 for alleged company car damage; ambiguity in contractual clause construed against employer (contra proferentem), and Respondent provided no evidence Claimant was responsible for the damage. | Upheld | — | £403 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,600
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998, regulation 14
- Apportionment Act 1870
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.