Case 6001815/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A White v Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001815/2025
- Decision date
- 3 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzgerald Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 28 November 2025 before Employment Judge Fitzgerald, the tribunal dealt with preliminary limitation issues in Ms A White's claims against Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land Ltd. The written record dated 3 December 2025 states that the decision was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
On the dismissal issue, the tribunal found that it was not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to lodge her constructive dismissal claim in time and that the claim was submitted within a further reasonable period in the circumstances, identified as 18 January 2025. The judgment then records that the unfair dismissal claim proceeds in line with the Case Management Order dated 3 December 2025.
On the discrimination claims, the tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit to 18 January 2025. Those claims also proceed in line with the Case Management Order dated 3 December 2025. The decision does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Preliminary time-limit issue only. The tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to lodge her constructive dismissal claim in time and that it was submitted within a further reasonable period, identified as 18 January 2025. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary time-limit issue only. The tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit to 18 January 2025 for the Claimant's discrimination claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.