Case 6001848/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Klima Respondent (1): Frasers Group Plc Respondent (2): Jack Wills Retail Ltd HELD by CVP at Leeds v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001848/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Klima Respondent (1): Frasers Group Plc Respondent (2): Jack Wills Retail Ltd HELD by CVP at Leeds
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of indirect age discrimination arising from the Frasers Group Loyal Service Policy, which came into force on 1 May 2022. The tribunal found that the claimant had already passed the five-year service milestone before the policy took effect, that the policy was drawn to his attention by email on 14 July 2022, and that by 22 July 2022 he knew he was being told he did not qualify for the five-year reward.
The tribunal accepted that the relevant act was the introduction of the policy on 1 May 2022 and rejected the submission that conduct extending over a period should be treated as done at the end of that period. It applied section 123 Equality Act 2010 and the guidance in Olufenso and Abertawe, and considered the length and reasons for delay. The tribunal found there was no meaningful action by the claimant until 5 May 2023, when he raised a grievance, and that after receiving CAB advice about the tribunal time limit he still waited until 18 September 2023 to present proceedings.
The tribunal concluded that the claim was out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time beyond the three-month period. It noted that the respondents were not claiming prejudice, but still held that the delay was long and that the claimant had not acted within the applicable time limit. The judgment therefore dismissed the claim. The applications for strike out and deposit were also dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Indirect age discrimination complaint dismissed because the tribunal found it was presented outside the three-month time limit and refused to extend time on just and equitable grounds. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- section 123(3)(a) Equality Act 2010
- Olufenso v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.