Case 6001860/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Jane Cassera v NHS Dorset Integrated Care Board — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001860/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David C.
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jane Cassera
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal by NHS Dorset Integrated Care Board was well-founded. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant a total of £4,358.00, comprising a basic award of £3,858.00 (calculated using a capped gross weekly pay of £643, age 59 at dismissal, and 4 years' employment yielding 6 weeks' entitlement) and a compensatory award of £500.00 for loss of statutory rights.
The Tribunal made no further compensatory award for loss of earnings on the basis that it was not just and equitable to do so, the Respondent having already made payments to the Claimant which represented just and equitable compensation for her unfair dismissal, and on the basis that she obtained alternative employment which mitigated her loss. The Claimant did not claim benefits and the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,358 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,358
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,858
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.